Archive for November, 2012

Saudi man is selling his castrated black African slave on Facebook

The black slave trade is alive and well in Saudi Arabia, a place where one can still visit the seventh century, and not be in a museum.

Tundra Tabloids (h/t Susan K)

BNI has posted several stories about the ongoing African slave trade in Arab Muslim countries that seems to go unnoticed by the UN and most of the world. If the video first person accounts by former slaves didn’t convince you, here is an ad that was recently placed by a Saudi at Facebook:

ABDUL FOR SALE: Castrated black African slave

The Arabic blogger at Basees.blogspot has the following Google translation of the above ad:

The ad:

Peace be upon you …

I have a [male] slave I bought from an African country and arranged for his visa and stay till I got him to Saudi [Arabia]

His description:

1 – Black skin. Tall 172 sm. Weight 60 kilos.
2 – Castrated (excellent for working with a family as he won’t rape your wife or children). You can check him out with a doctor or yourself if you have experience in the matter.
3 – [His] health is quite undamaged and has no imperfections.
4 – Age 26 years.
5 – Religion is Muslim and [he is] obedient and will not disobey you except in what displeases God. Please, the matter is very serious and is not a joke.



30% tax on all assets above $600,000 includes Cash value of property and bank accounts

Those Fleeing Obama’s America: Prepare to be taxed

– David Rushton (Bio and Archives)  Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Senator Charles Schumer has recently proposed a new law to tax Americans heavily for leaving the United States. It was in reaction to the news that Eduardo Saverin, co-founder of Facebook, had renounced his American Citizenship and was taking his $2 billion dollars in capital gains with him.

Schumer proposed to tax him 30%. Sadly John Boehner, Republican, Speaker of the House (I still think he’s a disguised Democrat), said he would support the measure.

Schumer must thank Adolph Hitler for this idea. The Fuehrer instituted the Reichsfluchsteuer  tax of 25% on Jews leaving the Fatherland in the 1930s. So Herr Schumer has merely taken the basic idea and upped it by 5%.

Richard Samuelson, history professor at California State University, San Bernardino, quoted by National Review points to the historical significance of Schumer’s bill.

“Schumer’s attack is fundamentally misguided, and reveals a disturbing attitude toward private property. Should it impose such a tax, the American government would be saying that property is no longer truly private.”

He goes on to point out that George Washington, in January 1777 made the heart-rending decision to allow his followers to cross to the English side and take all of their property and savings with them if they felt they would be better off under the rule of the King. This was one of the darkest periods of American history, but Washington knew that liberty was of paramount importance and felt he had no right to impound the property of the settlers. His followers were fighting for the liberty to live where they pleased and to be free of arbitrary taxation. Why should it be different now?

It is my opinion (and only my opinion at this point) that starting very soon the IRS will begin collecting an exit tax of up to 30% on any of your savings leaving the country. The first stage would be to tax only very large assets but later I believe the ceiling will come down to cover even modest nest eggs because this government is in deep financial trouble. Obama and the Congress continue to spend money at an alarming rate and only your savings can pay the bills.

But you still have time to avoid it.

During the 2007 legislative year of the US Congress,  a bill entitled “Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007” almost became law. This bill sought to impose an exit tax on all persons leaving the USA to take up residence abroad and thereby renouncing permanent resident status in the US, or people who renounced their US citizenship.

It was introduced by Rep Charles Rangel (Harlem NY), and co-sponsored by Representatives Earl Blumenauer, Joseph Crowley, John Larson, Sander Levin, John Lewis, Jim McDermott, Kendrick Meek, Earl Pomeroy and Chris Van Hollen. You will be amazed to learn that all of these Congressmen are Democrats. Not one Republican sponsored this bill.

As an Independent Republican who thinks that most Democrats are 100% wrong about practically everything, I almost hesitate to mention that I actually liked some things about Charlie Rangel. Of course there were many things I did not like about him too. I saw him as a Democrat who always stood up for his constituents (even if they were wrong). He was a flamboyant, charming, extrovert; a showman who loved publicity. I used to think of him almost as a later version of W.C Fields; a character you love, but you know you should hate. He was a Democrat with a sense of humor and probably the only one unless you count Biden and his humor is singularly unintentional.

Charlie distinguished himself in the U.S. Army. He was, in fact, a hero with a Purple Heart and a bronze Star. After leaving the army he attended University and became a lawyer (always a suspicious move in my opinion). In 1971 Charlie won a seat in Congress representing the heavily Democrat district of Harlem. In 2007 he became chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee. And that was probably the turning point at which Charlie went bad. He wasn’t really bad – bad, like some other Congressmen, Senators, and Presidents. He fudged his taxes and flirted with the finer points of the law. But, he was bad enough to be forced to resign when, on December 2, 2010; the full House approved a sanction of censure against him. Anyway, Charlie was the sponsor of that tax collection bill because Charlie wanted to keep the money close to home where he could keep an eye on it.

Similar bills were put forward many times. None of them passed.

Don’t hold your breath citizens. It will come up again soon. So, if you have any plans for leaving the country with your hard-earned savings you had better do it very soon.

30% tax on all assets above $600,000. This included the cash value of property and bank accounts

The general idea of the “Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007” was to discourage people from leaving the United States and taking their savings with them. In essence, it imposed a 30% tax on all assets above $600,000. This included the cash value of property and bank accounts

While similar bills have failed, and Schumer’s may also fail, how long do you think it will be before some of Obama’s thugs bring up a version that will pass? And, how long would it take the next Congress to vote that bill into law?

Most people do not have $600,000 anyway, but I’m sure this dedicated President will get to them eventually.

Let’s face it people—-the government is in trouble. They have a President who spends money like water. He can’t get his hands on enough of it and he will find many ways to tax you out of all of your savings until he has brought you down to the financial level of his half-brother in his native Kenya. In fact, his avowed aim is to make all men in the world equal in poverty, except for himself, of course. In his philosophy all men are equal except that some are more equal than others.

Even before I researched this bill,  I knew that Obama would be coming after those who leave the country to live in other lands early on. Few of those who remain in the United States would care about the fate of those who want to leave. Most Americans would not be able to leave anyway and they certainly would want your hard earned savings to be available for their use in the form of welfare. They would be horrified to think someone like you who wants to leave the Obama Utopia would be allowed to take their savings with them.

My wife Marcia and I saw this coming ten years ago and that is one of the reasons we felt compelled to find a home in another country. We were never rich. But we took what little we had and invested it in land and real estate seven years ago. We have never regretted that wise move.

We pay taxes to the IRS just as we did when living in the United States. The little we owe on our Social Security payments is not worth worrying about. We have not renounced our citizenship and have no plans to do so in the future. We are simply Americans living abroad.

This bill may never affect you as long as you move before it becomes law. In past versions it was not retroactive.

So, if you buy property abroad before the bill becomes law you should not have to worry. How long this will be I can’t say. But I would suggest that if you plan to move anyway, do it as soon as possible.

This message is for those who want to leave and have the means to do so.

Do it NOW. A year from now it may be too late.


Those Fleeing Obama’s America: Prepare to be taxed.

Iran blasts Canada as ‘racist’ and ‘self-centred’ for moving UN resolution condemning Islamic Republic’s abuses | News | National Post.

THIS is how islam treats women, and girls. islamist apologists claim islam ‘protects’ women…
islam; false religion of lies, murder and atrocity.

rarely do I ever come across such unadulterated propagandist crap and actually do a post about it.

But folks, tou have to know about the open sewer at the link below called ‘mother jones’ and the ‘book’ found there.

In short, it’s complete fiction with just enough carefully-selected bits of reality in it to suspend disbelief.



Organic-Farm Grade


Israel’s truth, as we all know is that they’ve been on the recieving end of open and genocidal hostility and agression from muslims for…well ever.

This idiotic site speaks about ‘The palestinian Plight’. Which is the same thing as if  bunch of folks from Newfoundland went down to Florida and took over the bottom half.

Who would you side with, especially if the new arrivals and their supporters were constantly harrassing and assaulting the natives?

Right, the Floridians.

SAME thing in Israel vs. Palestine.

But, the Leftist MSM and the modern age of Leftist approval of all atrocities that are muslim, well…how dare Israel defend itself!! Don’t they KNOW they’re supposed to just submit to their own destruction??!!

That’s basically the mentality behind this site and the book. I would strongly advise you to warn other folks against ever going near it, we have to choke out this kind of Leftist-Revisionist crap when it comes to news and history.

Israeli Vets Speak Out: What Really Goes On In Gaza | Mother Jones.

by Soeren Kern
November 27, 2012 at 5:00 am

“The most important goal of dialogue is “to introduce Islam” and “to correct the erroneous slanders raised against Islam.”Saudi Press Agency

Saudi Arabia has officially opened the doors of a controversial new “interreligious and intercultural dialogue center” in the Austrian capital, Vienna.

The King Abdullah International Center for Inter-Religious and Inter-Cultural Dialogue was inaugurated during an elaborate ceremony at the Hofburg Palace in downtown Vienna on November 26. More than 650 high-profile guests from around the world attended the event, including UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and the foreign ministers of the center’s three founding states, Austria, Spain and Saudi Arabia.

The Saudis say the purpose of the multi-million-dollar institution — which will be headquartered at the Palais Sturany in the heart of Vienna and will have the status of an international organization — is to “foster dialogue” between the world’s major religions in order to “prevent conflict.”

Critics, however, say the center is an attempt by Saudi Arabia to establish a permanent “propaganda center” in central Europe from which to spread the conservative Wahhabi sect of Islam.

Critics also say the Saudis deliberately chose Vienna to serve as the headquarters for the new organization because of the city’s historic role in preventing Islam from overrunning Christian Europe during the Siege of Vienna in 1529 and the Battle of Vienna in 1683. The Saudis, they say, are simply fighting a new phase of a very old conflict.

Austrian politicians on all sides of the political aisle have criticized the initiative, and the opening ceremony was accompanied by angry protesters who said that the Austrian government had “bowed the knee” to Saudi Arabia, and that the center was a “shame for Austria.”

The Green Party, which governs Vienna in a coalition, said the center glorified a country “where freedom of religion and opinion are foreign words.”

“Austria should not allow itself to be misused in this way, to allow itself to be involved in whitewash by a repressive Saudi regime which is using this center as a fig leaf for its dishonorable human rights situation,” the party said in a statement.

The first Muslim member of the Austrian Parliament, the Turkish-born Alev Korun, branded the project as “highly absurd.” She said Austrian Foreign Minister Michael Spindelegger “must be either incredibly naïve or only interested in business relations with Saudi Arabia.” She also accused the foreign minister of “closing both eyes” to breaches of human rights in Saudi Arabia.

The center-right newspaper Die Presse, in an editorial entitled, “Islamic Center in Vienna: Austria-Aid for Propagandists of Intolerance?,” wrote: “The Austrian government needs to ask itself whether it knows what it is doing: Is it not known that as the state religion of Saudi Arabia Wahhabism is fiercely opposed to other religions and uses ‘intercultural dialogue’ as a means for aggressive proselytizing?

“To clarify: Wahhabism is the only officially recognized and allowed religion in Saudi Arabia. Other forms of Islam and other religions are banned and persecuted by the state. Saudi Arabia is the only Islamic state in which there is no church, no synagogue and no other place of worship of any other religion. Shiite Muslims have been systematically discriminated against for decades. Jews are even forbidden to enter the Kingdom. Saudi Arabia practices a form of Sharia law that is one of the most brutal systems in the world. Saudi Arabia has at all times rejected the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. Women may not drive a car and can be punished by flogging. Corporal punishment, including amputations and executions, are part of everyday life in the country. Just two weeks ago a Sudanese immigrant in Saudi Arabia was publicly beheaded for ‘sorcery.’ Saudi Arabia is one of the few countries in the world in which the death penalty is enforced even on teenagers,” the paper said.

The paper concludes: “Does the Austrian Foreign Ministry really want to give such a state the opportunity to build an international propaganda center in Austria?”

Foreign Minister Spindelegger responded to the criticism by saying that he was “proud” of the initiative which “proved the readiness to start a real dialogue.” He also said “all kinds of discrimination and stereotyping based on religion or belief must be tackled.”

The King Abdullah Center — which will host seminars, conferences, dialogues and other events bringing together people of different backgrounds and faiths — will have a governing body composed of 12 representatives from the world’s five largest religions.

The governing board of directors is to be staffed by two Muslims (Sunni and Shiite), three Christians (Catholic, Anglican and Orthodox), a Buddhist, a Hindu and a Jew. The organization will also have a consulting body with 100 representatives from the five world religions plus other faiths as well as academics and members of civil society.

The Vatican said in a statement that it had accepted an invitation to participate in the center as a “founding observer” and it sent a high-level delegation to attend the inauguration ceremony.

Rabbi David Rosen, the Jewish member of the King Abdullah Center’s board of directors, said in an interview that the project presents a unique opportunity. “This is the first multifaith initiative from a Muslim source, and not just any source, but from the very hardcore heartland of Islam,” said Rosen, International Director of Interreligious Affairs of the American Jewish Committee (AJC). “It is an essential stage in King Abdullah’s efforts to change Saudi Arabia itself.”

Rosen was referring to the Saudi claim that interfaith dialogue in Vienna was aimed at bringing about religious reform in Saudi Arabia itself. Never mind that the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, the leading religious authority in the country, recently declared that all churches in the Arabian Peninsula must be destroyed. And that less than one week before the center in Vienna was inaugurated, the Saudi government introduced a new electronic system that tracks all cross-border movements of women, alerting their male guardians when they leave the country.

The Secretary General of the King Abdullah Center, Faisal bin Abdulrahman bin Muaammar, a former Saudi education minister, said the project was about dialogue, not politics. “We are facing some criticism here, we are facing some criticism in Saudi Arabia, but dialogue is the answer for this” Muaammar said.

Although Riyadh will finance the center for the first three years at an annual budget of 10-15 million euros ($13-20 million), there will be “zero politics, zero influence in the center,” Muaammar said.

The primary focus of the King Abdullah Center will be to promote a work program called “The Image of the Other,” which will examine stereotypes and misconceptions about Islam in education, the media and the Internet.

Critics say this work will parallel long-standing efforts by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a bloc of 57 Muslim countries, to pressure Western countries into making it an international crime to criticize Islam or Mohammed, all in the name of “religious tolerance.”

The Austrian Initiative of Liberal Muslims (ILMÖ) said “this dubious Wahhabist center in Vienna” will “only serve Saudi Arabia’s political and religious interests abroad, under the guise of dialogue” and that its sole aim was to make Riyadh “respectable.”

In case there was any doubt, the official Saudi Press Agency confirmed that dialogue is not a two-way street. The most important goal of dialogue, the agency says, is “to introduce Islam” and to “correct the erroneous slanders raised against Islam.”


Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook.


Saudi ‘Propaganda Center’ Opens in Vienna «.

TOP STORY OF THE MONTH: Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out | Alan Korwin

Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.

Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.

Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady’s plan to introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady’s current plans and targets of opportunity. It’s horrific. They’re going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They’ve made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states’ rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):

Rifles (or copies or duplicates):


M1 Carbine

Sturm Ruger Mini-14


Bushmaster XM15

Armalite M15


Thompson 1927

Thompson M1








NHM 90

NHM 91

SA 85

SA 93


Olympic Arms PCR


Calico Liberty

Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or DragunovSVU

Fabrique National FN/FAL



HK-91, HK-93



Thompson 1927 Commando

Kel-Tec Sub Rifle




SKS with detachable magazine

SLG 95

SLR 95 or 96

Steyr AU



Galil and Uzi Sporter

Galil Sporter or Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz)

Pistols (or copies or duplicates):


Calico M-110




Olympic Arms OA



TEC-22 Scorpion or AB-10


Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):


Armscor 30 BG

SPAS 12 or LAW 12

Striker 12


Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):


A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:

(i) a folding or telescoping stock,

(ii) a threaded barrel,

(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below),

(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.

Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than

10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).

A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has:

(i) a second pistol grip,

(ii) a threaded barrel,

(iii) a barrel shroud or

(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and

(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

A semiautomatic shotgun with:

(i) a folding or telescoping stock,

(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),

(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and

(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.

Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any “semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.”

Note that Obama’s pick for this office, Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this determination, the bill says, “there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.” In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public.

The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn’t have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose — is that devious or what? And of course, “sporting purpose” is a rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.

Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America

Forward or send to every gun owner you know…

Watch This, If You Want More Proof:

A partial list of gun rights groups:

Gun Owners of America

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership


National Rifle Association

Second Amendment Committee

Second Amendment Foundation

Second Amendment Sisters

Women Against Gun Control

TOP STORY OF THE MONTH: Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out | Alan Korwin |

islam; the religion of peace.

Also, the religion of brutality, sexual slavery, degradation, dehumanification, abuse, forced prostitution, perversity, corruption, arrogance, falseness, hypocrisy, murder, violence, rape and supremacism.

An inside look under the vapor-thing veneer that allows islam to fool people into making the mistake it’s a bona-fide religion when it’s demonstratably a false religion, and a cult of brutality and cruelty.


Coming soon, to a young white girl near you.

Yes, YOU,Your family, your female friends…!

This current uptick of Muslim terrorist activity and sexual grooming gangs in the U.S., combined with the surge of anti-American violence sweeping across the Islamic world, should teach us one simple thing: we don’t want more Muslims here.



By Eugene Gant V-Dare

AP described them as “four Southern California men” but of course the most recent would-be terrorists arrested by the FBI were actually three immigrants and one US-born Asian. Significantly, and ominously, two had converted to radical Islam in the US—and one of them was a Mexican immigrant.

Ultimately, it doesn’t matter why ranting mobs attacked our embassies and consulates in Libya, killing an ambassador and two former Navy SEALs, to name just a few victims. Maybe they’re enraged about a silly film. Or maybe we’re see Muslim nature taking its course in a planned attack. Either way, Islam rears its ugly head.

And if what Americans and their elected officials see on the tube isn’t enough to stop or at least severely curtail Muslim immigration from the Third World, perhaps some other news is: A Lebanese website published an unconfirmed report, misattributing the news to Agence France Presse, that Ambassador Christopher Stevens’ Muslim murderers sodomized and raped him. And an American homosexual blogger reported that Stevens was a homosexual.

Perhaps he wasn’t. Perhaps his captors didn’t sexually brutalize him, alive or dead. Stevens’ autopsy has not been released. And, of course, we can’t trust the Main Stream Media to tell us.

But this does gives us the opportunity to focus on another blessing of Muslim immigration: Jihadists do rape and use carnal humiliation to establish a climate of fear among the infidels. It’s happening in Occupied Europe—and it’s already happening here.

  • In the 2004 Muslim terrorist attack on a school in Beslan, Russia, the orgy of violence and sexual torture boggled the mind. According to one account, the Muslims stabbed infants, and screaming teenage girls were dragged into rooms adjoining the gymnasium where they were being held and raped by their Chechen [Muslim] captors who chillingly made a video film of their appalling exploits. … [C]hildren were forced to drink their own urine and eat the petals off the flowers they had brought their teachers after nearly three days without food or water.

crime report on child sexual exploitation revealed that “2,379 individuals were reported … as being possible offenders in relation to street grooming and child sexual exploitation,” while “2,083 victims of child sexual exploitation were reported to” British authorities. Their response: Politically Correct paralysis:

Police and social services have been accused of fueling a culture of silence which has allowed hundreds of young white girls to be exploited by Asian (Muslim) men for sex… A senior officer at West Mercia police has called for an end to the ‘damaging taboo’ connecting on-street grooming with race.

Detective Chief Inspector Alan Edwards said: ‘These girls are being passed around and used as meat. ‘To stop this type of crime you need to start everyone talking about it but everyone’s been too scared to address the ethnicity factor.

‘No one wants to stand up and say that Pakistani guys  are recruiting young white girls and passing them around their relatives for sex, but we need to stop being worried about the racial complication.’

Top detective blasts ‘culture of silence’ that allows Asian sex gangs to groom white girls… because police and social services fear being branded racist, By Chris Brooke, Daily Mail, January 5,  2011

Another report showed that cops do their best to hide Muslim crime for fear of the inevitable accusations of racism. [Police ‘covered up’ violent campaign to turn London area ‘Islamic’. By Andrew Gilligan, June 12 2011]

Meanwhile, immigrants are slowly Islamicizing England. Despite their tolerance for pederasty elsewhere, disciples of the Prophet have declared parts of London “gay-free zones” and harassed homosexual elected officials.

  • Scandinavia suffers a similar problem. Muslim men have waged a war of rape against .Swedes and Norwegians. Last year, a Norwegian television station revealed that “non-Western men” dominate the ranks of rapists in Norway and are responsible for 100 percent of the rapes in Oslo. A woman police officer said the “non-Western” men need understanding.

The blogger Fjordman, that intrepid warrior manning the crumbling ramparts of Christendom, reported in 2005 what Muslims think of Swedish women:

An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are ‘”asking for rape.”

Apparently, he’s not the only one thinking this way. “It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,”says Hamid. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably f****d before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard.

All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore … girl, I mean,” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get f****d to pieces.”

No wonder Fjordman concluded that “[t]he number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals.”

It resembles warfareMuhammad himself  had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law.

Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as “their women,” the women who “belong” to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hand. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime.

Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men — his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us — our future booty. No wonder there is a deep and increasing suspicion against Muslims in the Swedish and European public.

And it’s happening here in the U.S.

Forget about the honor killings Muhammed’s disciples have brought to the land of the free. Forget about Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood jihadist. Forget about the rise of Sharia law. The sexual war of conquest has begun.

  • In El Paso County, Colo., five Iraqis are charged with what one cop calls “most horrific sexual assaults I’ve seen in my career,” the local television station reported. “According to the affidavit, the victim described a conversation with the men that centered on how unhappy they were with the treatment they received in the United States.

    The men also spoke about ‘the United States oppressing them and calling them terrorists.’” Maybe that’s because they are.  [Suspects In Vicious Sex Assault Vacate Court Appearance, KKTV,August 27, 2012]

As Immigration and Customs Enforcement alleged in its account of the gang, members and associates of the gangs transported underage Somali and African-American females from the Minneapolis area to Nashville for the purpose of having the females engage in sex acts for money and other items of value.

As in Britain, some of the girls were allegedly 13 years old and even younger. The defendants who faced trial in May were among a group of 29, including women, almost all Somali Muslims.[Somalis face sex trafficking trial in Nashville, by  Kristin M. Hall, AP, March 20, 2012]

Where did these Somalis come from? Not a few of them came thanks to the State Department and its Leftist religious co-conspirators, crazy Lutherans and Catholics who “resettled” thousands upon thousands—meaning they dropped the Africans into all-white American neighborhoods without asking the neighbors what they thought about it.

Refugee Resettlement Watch reports the grim numbers: 4,413 Somalis landed here between 1983 and 1993. Within the decade after that, we had invited more than 41,000. And they still kept coming. Between 2004 and 2011, just more than 50,000 arrived. Nearly 13,000 arrived in 2004 alone. And more than 10,000 arrived in each of the two years after that. The total for the last 29 years is nearly 100,000.

And, of course, African Muslims who make a sport of mutilating dead bodies aren’t the only “refugees” the Left wants to resettle. Since 2004, Americans have been on the receiving end of well more than 120,000 Iraqis and Iranians, the former coming in hordes nearing 20,000 a year in 2009 and 2010.

That’s another reason the number of Muslims here has doubled since 2001. And no wonder the number of mosques has jumped 74 percent since 2000

Those numbers won’t slow down, the Pew Forum reported in 2011:

In the United States, for example, the population projections show the number of Muslims more than doubling over the next two decades, rising from 2.6 million in 2010 to 6.2 million in 2030, in large part because of immigration and higher-than-average fertility among Muslims. The Muslim share of the U.S. population (adults and children) is projected to grow from 0.8% in 2010 to 1.7% in 2030, making Muslims roughly as numerous as Jews or Episcopalians are in the United States today.

Americans should ask the Open Borders Left and its neocon auxiliaries at the Wall Street Journal Editorial Page a few questions. As the Muslim population increases, will we witness more or fewer honor crimes? Or terrorist attacks? Or  religio-political rapes?

And, given that Muslims have stoned Christians and tried to shut down free speech in Dearbornistan, how long will it be before parts of American cities are declared “gay-free zones” and young American women start wearing “reverse chastity belts”?

When will a major American city go up in flames after a Muslim punk kills himself running from police—or someone inadvertently insults the pedophile Prophet?

Not too far in the future, if what’s past in Europe is prologue for us.

MUSLIM IMMIGRATION = RAPE JIHAD. Coming soon, to a young white girl near you. Yes, YOU! | BARE NAKED ISLAM.


I’m Bisexual myself, just to say. Now, for all of you who are Bisexual or fully Gay, then you should really be paying attention to how islam and it’s leaders see us, as it’s through a hate-filled gaze, and possibly through crosshairs.

islam is a (false) religion of hypocrisy and perversity. In islam, it’s ‘OK’ to involve oneself in paedophilia and pedorasty, but as soon as it’s between two adults, then it becomes ‘homosexuality’ in the eyes of islam. islam embraces sexual practices that are at best dubious and in general absolutely against any Human standard of decency, such as Necrophilia.

So, as a warning for your own safety, consider carefully any support you give to islamic organizations, and instead, perhaps you should lend your voice to speaking against the one (false) religion that genuinely WILL kill you just for being who you are.

We’ve made some really fantastic gains in being accepted and islam would not just reverse all that, it’ll try it level best to exterminate us in a fashion every bit the same as the Nazis that islam allied itself with in WW2.

The same day Libyans are threatening to mutilate and

kill homosexuals, an Islamic cleric in London concurs

Brunel University in London’s upscale and renowned politically correct West End has found itself in its own politically correct-fueled firestorm as scheduled lecturer, Imam Abu Usamah at-Thahabi has declared, ”Homosexuals are perverted, dirty, filthy dogs who should be murdered…

Examiner  The British news portal tailored specifically for the homosexual community, is reporting that Muslim Imam Abu Usamah at-Thahabi is scheduled to present a lecture this week.

The topic of his lecture will be (pro-paedophilia) on the life Aisha, one of the many wives of Mohammed, the founder of the Islamic belief system. Aisha was Mohammed’s child-bride, who was betrothed at the age of six and had her marriage consummated by Mohammed when she was nine-years-old.

As cited by Pink News, Thahabi has publically stated from his mosque;

Ensuring his comments couldn’t be taken out of context, the Muslim holy man went on to preach;

“If I were to call homosexuals perverted, dirty, filthy dogs who should be murdered, that’s my freedom of speech, isn’t it?”

But that’s not all…

The British organization has posted on their official website that Thahabi has a history of controversial comments against non-Muslims, ex-Muslims and also of women in general. 

As cited, Thahabi has also preached at his Birmingham, England mosque;

“we hate the people of the kufr [non-Muslims]. We hate the kuffar.”

“whoever changes his religion from al-Islam to anything else, kill him in the Islamic state.”

“Allah has created the women, even if she gets a PhD, deficient…her intellect is incomplete, deficient.”

Brunel University recently touted on its official website that in a research study they themselves co-sponsored, that so-called multiculturalism and social diversity are “alive and well” in Great Britain as cited by one of the two researchers, Professor Tariq Modeed.






















The same day Libyans are threatening to mutilate and kill homosexuals, an Islamic cleric in London concurs | BARE NAKED ISLAM.

Now I can truly use this as a personal statement, with absolute honesty & conviction.
I love the character, and like her am tall, wear glasses, and I don’t take nonsense from people without handing it back in-kind. Husband and friends have mentioned (more than once) that I sound VERY much like the voice actress who supplies Bayonetta’s voice. I am pleased and proud of that–but it also makes me blush and feel a bit self-conscious.
It’s my statement against all that’s effed-up in our world, the creeping islamification, the jihadis threatening to wipe us out, radical black organizations calling for the extermination of all white people, and the PolCorr blinded Leftists selling us all out to those same enemies.
And, I mean it, too.
We all have our personal heroes, and she’s one of my two from fiction. For men, some identify with Clint Eastwood’s ‘Man With No Name’ character…
It’s a quality that makes us Human, and keeps us from being dull. 😀
I am a Witch, Initiated and Consecrated to Hecate on Nov 16th. Not an easy Rite, but an accomplishment I am proud of and honored deeply by, and I am now learning the Basics, my first steps into a much larger world of knowledge and perspective. The Elder instructing me, is in his 80’s and a good teacher, a Man I respect and look up to like a Grandfather.

But no matter what, I’ll never be able to pull of the same sleek-&-sexy look Bayonetta does. 🙂

%d bloggers like this: